Louisiana Supreme Court Halts Case Against Attorney General Liz Murrill
The Louisiana Supreme Court halted the criminal case against state Attorney General Liz Murrill on Friday. This decision came a day after she faced accusations of job threats aimed at New Orleans officials. The court identified procedural errors in the indictment process, citing media reports of a journalist being obstructed.
This pause temporarily stops the case. Murrill, a Republican, plans to request a case dismissal, highlighting a growing divide between state Republicans and Democrats in New Orleans. She described the charges as a ‘political witch hunt.’
Indictment Flaws Highlighted by Supreme Court
The 16-count indictment accused Murrill of intimidation and misconduct. The Supreme Court found significant issues with the charges. Justice Jay McCallum noted procedural defects undermining the indictment’s validity and suggested potential conflicts of interest with Laurie White, the prosecutor.
The court emphasized the law requires threats to be unlawful or involve potential harm, not met by Murrill’s actions. They indicated Murrill would likely succeed in dismissing the case and suffer irreparable damage if it proceeded.
The decision saw support from four Republican justices and one Democrat. Another Democrat and an independent dissented, with Justice John Guidry criticizing the expedited process.
Underlying Political Dispute
The case stems from changes in Louisiana’s court system, including the merger of New Orleans criminal court clerk positions. This followed Calvin Duncan’s election to the position after his wrongful conviction was overturned. Murrill and others did not recognize Duncan’s exoneration, prompting further controversy.
The court highlighted a potential conflict involving White’s previous representation of Duncan. Murrill warned city officials of possible consequences for supporting Duncan, which she maintains was within her duties.
Following the indictment, Governor Jeff Landry expressed intentions to pardon Murrill. He directed an investigation into the grand jury’s conduct and described the indictment as politically motivated.