Riverside Controversy Over City’s Allegations Against Resident

The Riverside City Council recently sent a controversial letter to Susan Freeman, the wife of City Manager Mike Futrell. Accusations against Freeman included harassing city employees with calls, emails, and social media posts. This letter has sparked widespread debate about free speech and workplace boundaries.

Allegations and Response

The letter accused Freeman of disruptive behavior in the workplace and claimed she implied involvement in the city’s decision-making. Freeman denied the accusations, asserting her right to express opinions, especially her criticisms of President Trump. She stated, “I did not do the things accused in that letter and I can prove that. But even if I had, it was still my right.”

Background on Mike Futrell and Susan Freeman

The couple moved to Riverside about three years ago. Futrell is a retired Navy captain and former Republican representative in Louisiana, now an independent. Freeman, a communications specialist, has expertise in diversity, equity, inclusion, and authored a self-help book titled “Own Your Story.” She became known for hosting community events and joining local initiatives.

Public Reaction and Additional Controversies

Freeman faced scrutiny over meetings with city staff and her social media activity. An anonymous email questioned her interactions with municipal staffers. Another message criticized a Facebook post by Freeman regarding the presidential election. Despite criticism, Freeman continued engaging in public discourse.

Freeman filed a public records request to uncover evidence supporting the council’s allegations. Documents released included anonymous letters accusing her of “civic indecency” for her active involvement in city matters.

Freeman’s interactions with Hunter, a former city employee turned whistleblower, further fueled tension. A Facebook exchange led Hunter to file a records request to access the council’s letter to Freeman, which he then shared online.

Career Impact on Mike Futrell

Futrell was considered for a city manager role in Pasadena but withdrew after the letter became public. He suggested the allegations played a role in the decision.

At a city council review of his performance, Futrell urged for a fair evaluation based on all available facts. “Some of the allegations involve my wife, my family,” he said. “They deserve the same basic fairness anyone would expect.” As of now, he remains in his position.

The situation continues to raise questions about privacy, public conduct, and accountability within the city administration.