Church Leaders Criticize Decision to Avoid Charges for Protesters Disrupting Service

A recent decision by the St. Paul City Attorney’s office not to pursue state criminal charges against dozens of protesters who interrupted a Minnesota church service has sparked controversy. The decision involves former CNN journalist Don Lemon and other activists who disrupted the service in January.

City Attorney Irene Kao stated that an evaluation of video footage and investigative reports revealed insufficient evidence to support criminal charges under Minnesota law. This statement explained the basis for not pursuing charges against the protesters.

Federal prosecutors have charged 39 individuals, including Don Lemon, with civil rights violations related to the event. These federal cases are still pending.

“According to the St. Paul City Attorney’s logic, it is perfectly fine for agitators to invade a mosque, a cathedral, or a temple, intimidate the families and children inside, and shut down their religious gathering. Just call it a ‘protest,’” said Jonathan Parnell, lead pastor at Cities Church.

The protest on January 18 targeted Cities Church after allegations surfaced that one of its pastors was an ICE official involved in federal enforcement operations. Protesters were heard chanting “Justice for Renee Good” in response to a fatal shooting involving federal agents.

Kao emphasized that the absence of charges should not be viewed as an endorsement of unlawful actions. She noted that the protest did not involve violence or property damage. The church’s attorneys argued that this does not negate any legal violations.