Lake County Community Opposes Grayslake T5 Data Center Amid Tensions

A Lake County community has formally opposed the Grayslake T5 data center project. The decision has not been without internal disagreements, highlighting increased tensions over similar developments across Illinois. A recent meeting of Avon Township was unusually crowded, resonating with other recent local government gatherings where residents and advocates expressed their opposition to the data center.

Despite large sections of the village being within Avon Township, the T5 data center lies in Fremont Township, making the township’s resolution unlikely to impact the project directly. However, legal challenges might be forthcoming. Chloe Russell, attorney for the Lake County Data Center Opposition Coalition, indicated legal action is likely. She also collaborates with groups opposing data centers in Yorkville and Joliet.

State and Local Actions

On a broader scale, state actions have influenced the debate. Governor J.B. Pritzker has issued an executive order halting tax incentives for data centers starting in July. This decision follows the failure of several data center-related measures in the General Assembly.

State Senator Darby Hills has introduced legislation to address these concerns. Her proposal includes requiring more local input on data center projects, establishing buffer zones around residential areas, and tackling issues related to water use, contamination, and noise. Hills stated her support for data centers in industrial areas but underscored the need to protect residential zones.

The T5 site’s zoning as a light industrial zone facilitated its rapid approval, according to village officials. It is situated near the future site of Ivanhoe Village in Mundelein, a significant housing and commercial development planned for completion over two decades.

County and Municipal Reactions

The Lake County Board implemented its moratorium on data center projects in unincorporated areas. The moratorium aims to provide time to develop specific regulations, reflecting the national trend of increased data center projects. Board member Esiah Campos highlighted the county’s goal to create a “model framework” for other communities to adopt.

The Avon Township resolution, despite being symbolic, reflects local opposition. The resolution passed with four votes in favor and one abstention from Supervisor Michele Bauman. Some board members expressed frustration regarding the resolution’s introduction, yet ultimately supported it.

“If we take the time to do this correctly, other communities will be able to adopt proven regulations that protect residents while providing clear expectations for industry partners,” said Campos.

Community Concerns

Supervisor Michele Bauman raised concerns about the resolution’s appropriateness, given that Avon Township lacks authority over the development. She proposed an alternative resolution emphasizing transparency, public information, and community engagement. Bauman encouraged residents to voice concerns to Grayslake, Fremont Township, and other relevant governmental bodies.

Despite Bauman’s neutral stance, the community was not receptive to her resolution, which omitted references to potential data center impacts. This sparked notable debate among residents, requiring moderation during the meeting. Board members Lizbeth Henning and Rebecca Nieder advocated for community interests, stressing the impact on local seniors and residents.