Smithsonian Faces Ideological Clash As Trump Pushes Changes

The Smithsonian Institution is under scrutiny as former President Donald Trump aims to install warning signs outside its history museum, labeling it as ideologically ‘captured.’ This move comes after a White House report accused the museum of shifting from historical education to political activism.

Controversial Exhibits

One exhibit speculated that Benjamin Franklin might have included enslaved individuals in his electrical experiments. Another displayed a ‘crotch harness’ used for sadomasochistic purposes. These elements have fueled criticism from some quarters.

In November 2021, the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History unveiled ‘The Electric Dr. Franklin,’ which highlighted Franklin’s scientific achievements while acknowledging his past as a slaveowner. Speculations about his use of enslaved individuals in experiments were part of the narrative, provoking mixed reactions.

Historical Debates

Criticism regarding the museum’s focus dates back to 1999 when a commentator noted its lack of attention to central U.S. historical events and figures. In 2002, a commission recommended a transformation to balance America’s achievements and failures in exhibits.

The museum’s approach evolved, dividing history into various thematic exhibits. These include ‘American Enterprise,’ ‘American Democracy,’ and others focusing on transportation and culture.

Political Challenges

The Smithsonian has long received bipartisan support. However, recent cultural and political shifts have altered this dynamic. The pandemic and societal reactions to racial issues prompted a reconsideration of priorities, resulting in new directions perceived as woke by some conservatives.

Trump’s involvement intensified in March 2025, with directives to remove ‘improper ideology.’ This action followed his earlier presidency’s minimal influence on the Smithsonian.

In July, heated debates in House committees centered on exhibit content, with particular focus on sexually explicit artifacts. Anthea Hartig, the museum director, faced intense questioning regarding the museum’s focus and representations.

The Search for a National Narrative

The National Museum of American History has struggled with its identity, swinging between technology and a broader historical narrative. Its approach contrasts with more focused Smithsonian museums, such as the National Museum of African American History & Culture, which follows a chronological design.

While the museum continues to draw visitors with notable artifacts, such as Lincoln’s top hat and historical exhibits, its coherence and lighting are subjects of criticism. Moving forward, questions remain about its role in imparting a unified national narrative.

Future Uncertainty

The Smithsonian’s leadership is at a crossroads. With several board positions vacant, the selection of Lonnie Bunch’s successor will impact the institution’s direction. Remarkably, the museum’s future and ideological stance will influence its ability to balance historical education with the changing political landscape.