Trump Administration’s Decision on Beauty School Accreditation

The Trump administration is evaluating the future of an accreditor responsible for about 1,300 beauty and cosmetology schools. This decision involves more than 120,000 students. It could influence how President Trump’s plans to change higher education accreditation apply beyond diversity battles that have been central to the issue.

During the 2024 campaign, President Trump promised to “fire the radical left accreditors.” He called accreditation his “secret weapon” against politically influenced colleges. However, the current case before the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) differs from previous standards involving diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). It focuses on whether the National Accrediting Commission of Career Arts and Sciences (NACCAS) has met federal requirements. If not, consequences may follow.

“Many beauty and cosmetology schools might lose accreditation, affecting participation in federal student aid.”

Recognition by a DOE-approved accreditor is crucial for schools to access federal student aid programs. NACCAS accredits around 1,300 institutions. These serve more than 120,000 students in beauty-related career programs. DOE staff pointed out issues but recommended keeping federal recognition with conditions while NACCAS works to comply.

The National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI) took a firmer stance in July. They voted 9-3 to suggest denying NACCAS renewed recognition. The DOE is yet to decide.

The DOE explained that accreditor recognition is reviewed every five years. This involves DOE staff recommendations, independent bipartisan NACIQI evaluations, and final decisions by senior department officials. The DOE stated they won’t comment while the process continues.

Some students worry about funding sources that enabled them to attend beauty schools. For example, Aliyah Fernandez, a cosmetology graduate, shared that federal aid made her education possible. It allowed her to pursue a career while staying involved in her daughter’s life.

“Having a career that allows flexibility is crucial for many students.”

Similarly, Blythe Fields, an expectant mother studying cosmetology, noted that federal aid helped her continue education while maintaining long work hours. She emphasized the importance of flexibility in supporting her family.

Both Fernandez and Fields initiated a petition urging the DOE not to adopt NACIQI’s recommendation outright. They propose a monitored improvement period for NACCAS to address the findings while maintaining recognition. Fernandez acknowledges federal officials’ concerns but believes outright denial is excessive.

Disagreement over NACCAS centers on the identified deficiencies during review. DOE staff recommended restrictions on NACCAS accrediting new institutions until compliant. NACIQI recommended outright denial. Zakiya Smith Ellis, a committee member, argued against further opportunities for NACCAS to address issues. Concerns about debt and student earnings at NACCAS-accredited institutions were raised.

In contrast, Robert Eitel, a former DOE official, argued that NACCAS should correct its deficiencies rather than lose recognition. Eitel highlighted potential negative impacts on schools and students.

“The issue contrasts with accreditation practices showcased in Trump’s executive orders.”

The proceedings differ from past orders directing investigations on accreditors requiring unlawful discrimination through DEI standards. The current NACCAS case revolves around compliance issues.

Smith Ellis has defended DEI policies and previously served in the Obama administration. She didn’t respond to requests for comments from Fox News Digital on her decision to support denial over corrective measures proposed by the DOE.

Fields believes beauty careers often receive less focus than traditionally male-dominated trades. She suggests that perception plays a role in the ongoing situation.

As the decision remains pending, the outcome will affect students, beauty schools, and the accreditation process.