- October 15, 2026
- Updated 5:37 am
Candidates Exchange Barbs in Final Debate
- 6 Views
- admin
- October 14, 2026
- Election Coverage Politics
The concluding debate between Councilmember Nithya Raman and Mayor Karen Bass saw intense exchanges as they presented their closing arguments.
Final Jabs and Policy Highlights
Nithya Raman criticized Mayor Karen Bass for being an “MIA” mayor and highlighted the rise of homelessness under her tenure. Raman emphasized the need to restore functionality and affordability in Los Angeles, aiming to build a community where people can pursue their dreams.
Karen Bass defended her career in public service, focusing on her initiatives against the Trump administration and addressing homelessness. She challenged Raman’s voting record, particularly on issues like encampments and police staffing.
Addressing ‘Problem Properties’
The candidates discussed their approaches to handling problematic properties in Los Angeles. Raman expressed frustration with slow inter-departmental communication and pledged to enhance coordination among city departments to enforce actions against negligent property owners.
Bass proposed the allocation of $2 million to expedite property clearance, noting that her original budget proposal to address nuisance properties was cut by the council.
Film Industry Job Retention
Amid concerns about the exodus of film jobs, Bass appointed a film czar to simplify filming in L.A., while Raman promised to advocate for unlimited tax credits to keep production local.
Immigration Policy and Advocacy
On immigration issues, Bass explained her budget decisions and reiterated her past actions against ICE. Raman criticized Bass for losing immigrant trust and opposed data sharing between LAPD and ICE.
Mansion Tax Debate
Both candidates debated Measure ULA, the “mansion tax,” and its impact on housing development. Raman, initially supportive, sought exemptions for new apartments. Bass highlighted the need for affordable housing and had proposed state-level reforms.
Fire Department Funding
Bass and Raman backed a tax increase to enhance L.A. Fire Department resources. Bass stressed local voter involvement, while Raman acknowledged the tax burden but emphasized the need for more firefighters and updated equipment.
Response to Past Fires
Bass apologized for her absence during the Palisades fire and expressed commitment to better preparation for future disasters. Raman criticized the city’s handling and emphasized the need for leadership change.
License Plate Readers and Surveillance
Raman expressed skepticism towards massive surveillance tools like automatic license plate readers without proven efficacy. Bass supported their usage but opposed renewing the contract with Flock due to privacy concerns.
Homelessness Strategies
The candidates clashed over methodologies to address homelessness. Raman criticized Bass’s Inside Safe initiative as costly and ineffective, while Bass defended its accomplishments and reminded that Raman approved funding for it.
Public Safety and Police Issues
Raman did not commit to replacing LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell, despite her criticisms of his leadership. Bass asserted the mayor’s authority to make such changes, cautioning against the potential disruption it could cause.
The debate concluded with both candidates stressing their visions for Los Angeles, amidst the backdrop of pressing issues and the impending November election.