NATO Allies Fill U.S. Military Contribution Gaps
BRUSSELS – NATO’s top commander expressed confidence that European allies have nearly covered the gaps left by the U.S. withdrawal of certain military contributions. U.S. General Alex Grynkewich has emphasized the need for European nations to supply more military equipment after the U.S. announced on June 3 it would scale down its contributions, including an aircraft carrier, support ships, aerial refueling planes, and fighter jets.
Grynkewich has initiated contingency planning to prepare for potential attacks on Europe. The NATO Force Model serves as the alliance’s strategic plan to mobilize forces from its 32 member nations in times of peace, crisis, or war. This model outlines the military assets that can be deployed in stages during the first six months of a conflict.
“In a matter of weeks, European Allies have largely filled the gaps left by U.S. reductions to the NATO Force Model,” said Grynkewich. However, for those areas where such gaps still exist, alternative capabilities are being considered.
Leading up to the July 7-8 summit in Turkey, Grynkewich and others are focused on force planning. This aspect will be a key agenda topic during the gathering of President Donald Trump and alliance counterparts.
The U.S. decision to reduce its military commitments surprised some NATO allies, as the Pentagon shifts attention toward potential threats in regions like the Indo-Pacific, with a particular focus on China. In response, European allies and Canada have examined their resources, preparing to offer support in case of an attack.
For example, Britain has increased the readiness of a second aircraft carrier and F35 fighter jets for emergencies. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has downplayed the long-term impact of the U.S. decision. He argues that should a conflict arise, the U.S. would realign resources back to Europe, similar to its actions during the war on Iran.
“This is not about where forces and assets are currently located,” Rutte noted. “It’s about who would do what if our defense plans were activated.”
NATO’s Article 5, a cornerstone of the alliance’s security policy, states that an attack on one member is an attack on all. While not an obligation for military support, many allies are expected to provide assistance.